Ruto Faces Backlash Over Chapati-Making Machine Promise
Ruto’s recent promise to fund the purchase of a chapati-making machine for Nairobi schools has sparked controversy among Kenyans. While some students cheered the announcement, many citizens took to social media to criticize the pledge, calling it a misplaced priority amid pressing economic challenges.
During his tour of Nairobi, Ruto assured students at St. Teresa Girls Secondary School that his government would support the mass production of chapatis to enhance the school feeding program. The commitment came after Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja proposed the idea, stating that the initiative would benefit over 300,000 students under the ‘Dishi Na County’ program.
Despite the excitement from students, Kenyans online were quick to challenge the practicality of the plan. Many argued that the government should focus on more urgent matters like education funding, healthcare, and the rising cost of living rather than investing in chapati-making machines.
Kenyans React to Ruto’s Chapati Pledge
The reaction to Ruto’s announcement has been largely negative, with many taking to social media to mock the initiative. Critics accused the president of prioritizing trivial projects instead of addressing the country’s pressing economic and social issues.
One online user humorously compared Ruto’s promise to global leaders’ achievements. “Chinese president launches bullet trains, Japan builds nuclear plants, and Burkina Faso constructs hospitals. Meanwhile, our president is launching a chapati-making machine,” the user remarked.
Popular satirist Kibet Bull also joined the conversation, stating that Ruto’s administration seems more focused on publicity stunts than substantial development. Other Kenyans pointed out that the government continues to make promises without fulfilling past commitments, further eroding public trust.
The ‘El Chapo’ Nickname Trends Online
Following Ruto’s chapati machine remarks, Kenyans on social media jokingly dubbed him “El Chapo.” The name, a playful twist on the infamous Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, gained traction due to the similarity between “Chapo” and the Kenyan slang for chapati.
The nickname quickly spread, with memes and AI-generated images flooding social media platforms. Many saw the humorous moniker as a reflection of the president’s frequent promises, which some believe lack real impact on the country’s development.
One user sarcastically noted, “Is there any promise this man won’t make? A lie he won’t tell? He has moved from deceiving adults to misleading schoolchildren!” Others questioned how the chapati project would be financed, especially given Kenya’s growing debt and economic struggles.
The Cost of Producing a Million Chapatis Daily
Critics have raised concerns about the financial implications of Ruto’s chapati-making machine project. A financial analysis by Citizen Digital revealed that producing one million chapatis per day could cost taxpayers an estimated Ksh. 10 million daily, translating to Ksh. 2.5 billion annually.
This figure accounts for essential ingredients such as flour and cooking oil but excludes other operational costs like labor, transportation, and maintenance. Analysts argue that such a massive expenditure could be better utilized in funding more critical sectors, including healthcare and education.
The revelation further fueled criticism, with many questioning the government’s priorities. “If this money were directed to schools, we could improve facilities, pay teachers better, and provide quality meals without relying on a machine,” a concerned citizen stated.
Ruto’s History of Controversial Promises
Ruto’s chapati-making machine pledge is the latest in a series of ambitious promises that have sparked debate. Throughout his presidency, he has been criticized for making grand announcements that fail to materialize.
From pledging to lower the cost of living to introducing affordable housing projects, many of his commitments remain unfulfilled. The clergy and other stakeholders have urged the president to focus on action rather than declarations, warning that continuous unkept promises could erode public confidence.
Despite this, Ruto appears undeterred, maintaining that his administration is committed to transforming Kenya through innovative solutions. His supporters argue that the chapati machine is a step towards addressing food security in schools, but skeptics remain unconvinced.
The Bigger Picture: Misplaced Priorities?
For many Kenyans, Ruto’s chapati-making machine initiative highlights deeper concerns about governance and decision-making. At a time when the nation faces economic hardships, high unemployment rates, and healthcare challenges, critics argue that the government should prioritize more pressing issues.
Social media discussions continue to emphasize the need for a more strategic approach to governance. “We are not against feeding students, but is a chapati machine the best solution? What about sustainable agriculture, proper nutrition programs, and improved school funding?” a social commentator questioned.
Experts suggest that rather than investing in expensive machinery, the government should explore alternative ways to enhance school feeding programs. Solutions such as direct food subsidies, local farming partnerships, and better resource management could provide more sustainable outcomes.
Ruto’s chapati-making machine promise has sparked heated debates across Kenya, with many questioning its necessity and feasibility. While the initiative may appeal to students, critics argue that it reflects misplaced priorities at a time when the country faces more pressing challenges.
As Kenyans continue to scrutinize the government’s decisions, it remains to be seen whether this latest promise will be fulfilled or fade away like others before it. The debate underscores the broader concern about governance, accountability, and the need for meaningful development initiatives in Kenya.
