Nyanza MP has sharply criticized the latest ambassadorial appointments from State House, claiming they sideline certain communities and violate constitutional principles. His warning adds tension at a sensitive political moment as coalition talks continue.
Homa Bay Town MP George Peter Kaluma has launched a fierce attack on the government’s latest foreign service appointments, accusing State House of ignoring constitutional requirements on fairness and regional balance.
The outspoken legislator specifically pointed fingers at State House Chief of Staff Felix Koskei following a press release announcing several new ambassadorial and deputy ambassadorial nominations to missions abroad, including Copenhagen and Mogadishu.
According to Kaluma, the appointments go beyond routine administrative changes.
He argues they reflect what he calls a long-standing pattern of exclusion affecting sections of the country particularly the Luo community despite clear constitutional guidelines meant to ensure inclusivity in public service.
At the center of his argument is Article 232 of Kenya’s Constitution, which outlines the values and principles of public service, including representation of Kenya’s diverse communities.
Kaluma insists the newly announced list fails this test, claiming it lacks meaningful regional balance.
Taking to social media, the MP openly challenged Koskei to uphold constitutional standards instead of facilitating what he described as discriminatory decision-making.
His remarks quickly sparked debate online, with supporters praising his stance while critics accused him of politicizing routine appointments.
The timing of Kaluma’s outburst is significant. The Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) is currently navigating delicate coalition dynamics with the administration, making internal disagreements particularly sensitive. Analysts say such public criticism highlights underlying tensions that could influence future political alignments.
Kaluma has vowed to escalate the matter beyond public statements. He says Parliament must rigorously scrutinize the nominations to guarantee transparency and fairness.
Among the actions he proposes are legislative oversight measures and a broader audit of public service appointments to confirm regional equity.
Why This Matters
This dispute touches on a recurring national conversation about representation, fairness, and constitutional compliance in government appointments.
With coalition politics in play and ethnic balance remaining a sensitive issue, the fallout from these remarks could shape both parliamentary debates and political alliances in the coming months.
As the nominations move through formal processes, attention will likely shift to whether oversight institutions intervene and whether the government adjusts its approach to address growing concerns.
